The more expensive the polyacrylamide price, the better, right? You will know when you read this article.

The more expensive the polyacrylamide is, the better the effect is. This is obviously wrong. In turn, the better the polyacrylamide effect, the more expensive the price is. Is this proposition established? Let's discuss it below:

 

What determines the good or bad effect of polyacrylamide?

 

The good or bad of polyacrylamide needs to be judged according to its use conditions. When the effect is different, the factors that determine its quality are different. In the field of water treatment, when polyacrylamide acts as a precipitate, its quality can be observed by observing the flocculation effect (size of the clump), the sedimentation rate, the clarity of the water, the amount of polyacrylamide used, the dissolution rate of polyacrylamide, and whether it can be satisfied. The site use requirements and the like are determined. When polyacrylamide acts as air flotation, its good and bad need to be observed: flocculation effect, air flotation speed, clarification of water effluent, amount of polyacrylamide used, dissolution rate of polyacrylamide, whether it can meet the subsequent desliming effect on site. When polyacrylamide acts on sludge dewatering, its good or bad can be observed: floc size, dewatering effect, clarification of effluent, coagulation reaction rate, amount of polyacrylamide, dissolution rate, effect in filter press, Mud moisture content and so on.

 

 

Polyacrylamide experimental effect

 

When we know the effect of polyacrylamide, we can select the model with better effect by small test selection, pilot qualitative, large test and quantitative steps. For example: For example, polyacrylamide is used in coal washing plants. I have encountered many distributors who like to use non-ionic polyacrylamide because non-ionic products can adapt to a wider range. When washing different coal materials, they can be replaced without changing the chemicals. Many after-sales problems. However, in actual use, it is possible that the coal washed by the coal washing plant can be treated well with anionic polyacrylamide, and the effect is in no way inferior to nonionic polyacrylamide. Then why don't we choose anionic polyacrylamide that is cheap, small in use, good in effect, and more cost effective? Similarly, many unprofessional suppliers can provide you with products that you can use, not products that are more suitable for you and have the best performance at the lowest price.

 

Obviously, the more expensive the polyacrylamide price, the better the effect and the better the polyacrylamide effect. The more expensive the price, the two propositions are wrong. When choosing a product, we must choose a professional supplier. In the selection experiment, we should select layers to select the products that are the best for you and the price is not expensive. Remember to consider the price issue when choosing a product. For the same effect, it is preferable to use anionic polyacrylamide, followed by nonionic polyacrylamide, and finally consider cationic polyacrylamide (cationic polyacrylamide from low ionic to high) Ionicity is selected).